Full Disclosure: What follows is a highly subjective
narrative based on my personal experience of being a 100% fan[1] of
the above pictured writer who was known for his favouring of incredibly long
sentences and footnotes but more importantly was inhabited by a crushing
brilliance and infallible genius that allowed him to describe exactly what it
feels like to be a live, thinking homosapien in this crazy modern world we call
home.
'In his final hours, he had tidied up the
manuscript so that his wife could find it. Below it, around it, inside his two
computers, on old floppy disks in his drawers were hundreds of other
pages—drafts, character sketches, notes to himself, fragments that had evaded
his attempt to integrate them into the novel. This was his effort to show the
world what it was to be “a f***ing human being.” He had not completed it to his
satisfaction. This was not an ending anyone would have wanted for him, but it
was the ending he chose.'
In his fiction he explored hideous men, anxiety, obsession and addiction; in his non-fiction he tackled everything from luxury cruise liners to Presidential campaigns, state fairs to dictionaries of American Usage. Oh, and tennis, always tennis. Through it all, his insane genius is evident and all is peppered with gut-wrenching hilarity and an epiphanic sadness that just plain nails the human condition. With The Pale King (and I’ve been lucky enough to read 120 pages of it so far) he describes the lives of the employees at an Internal Revenue Service centre, and its central character is a David Wallace[4]. It is about boredom (which was apparently coined before the word ‘interesting’),
‘About negotiating boredom as one would a terrain, its levels and forests and endless wastes. Learned about it extensively, exquisitely, in my interrupted year. And now ever since that time have noticed, at work and in recreation and time with friends and even the intimacies of family life, that living people do not speak much of the dull. Of those parts of life that are and must be dull. Why this silence? Maybe it’s because the subject is, in and of itself, dull … There may, though, I opine, be more to it … as in vastly more, right here before us all, hidden by virtue of its size’.
In all his work he has shown me
this. Which is why he is my favourite, why I love his writing, why I was
devastated by his death and why I am unbelievably honoured, excited and
privileged to be able to work on this book and to bring this peerless
chronicler of modernity to the audience his singular genius deserves.
Matt Clacher
Literary Marketing Executive
[1] I would go out on a limb here and say, w/r/t David Foster Wallace, that he is in fact my favourite writer of all time and has, in Infinite Jest, written the most accomplished and enjoyable novel I have ever read.
[2] An honourable mention should also go Melville’s Bartleby the Scrivener
[3] As HH’s own Zadie Smith says, ‘he’s so modern he’s in a different time-space continuum from the rest of us.’
[4] Although as his author’s forward claims, w/r/t him (the real David Wallace) being the main character, that this isn’t a cute, look-mum-no-hands “metafictional titty pincher”.

"It is about boredom (which was apparently coined before the word ‘interesting’)"
The first recorded use of 'boredom' was by Charles Dickens in Bleak House, in 1852. Don't know when 'interesting' was coined, but I'd be a bit surprised if it was later than that.
Also, re: footnote 4, sorry but the use of "forward" instead of "foreword" is one of my personal bugbears. Please don't say it has spread to the good house of Penguin!
Posted by: John Self | May 08, 2009 at 03:04 PM
Some Friday-afternoon investigation later: "interesting" was first recorded in 1711 but with the meaning of 'important' - the current meaning was first noted around 1768.
Posted by: John Self | May 08, 2009 at 03:56 PM
Nice investigating! It is referenced in the Wiggle Room extract. It was 'bore' not 'boredom'.
'Note, too, that “interesting” first appears just two years after “bore.” 1768. Mark this, two years after. Can this be so?'
Apologies for my mistake. 'For(e)wa(o)rd' is also one of mine, mistakes that is.
Posted by: Matt | May 08, 2009 at 04:39 PM
Hi,
This site is telling about the boredom it is a very interesting thing and everybody should know about the boredom actually the 'boredom' was used by Charles Dickens in Bleak House, in 1852. Don't know when 'interesting' was coined, but I'd be a bit surprised if it was later than that.
==================================
shelly
sapience
Posted by: shelly | July 22, 2009 at 07:32 AM